Update Dinesh D'Sousa follows up on Predictions

Apparently the concept of mass mind control has been mastered by our keepers.

We know for a fact that 1. World Trade #7 was imploded. 2 Barack Obama was placed in office by those who control Washington (his birth Certificate and his voter registration were proven without a doubt to be a fakes!) 3 The "news media" ignore anything that might make the government look obviously corrupt. 4 The constitution has ceased to be the law of the land 5 We are getting gun registration when we don't even have a national voter registration, 6 Forty Six Senators voted FOR the UN Small Arms Treaty 7 AGW has been proven decisively to  have been fabricated and yet is still harped on by government and the media as causing almost every bad thing. 8 Anyone, who might possibly stand in the way of total government takeover, is being demonized. 9 We have basically open borders and a government that just cant seem to do anything about it. 10. we have no energy policy while we waste $Trillions and thousands of lives fighting imaginary enemies in oil rich countries... The list is endless, but the point is, we are becoming serfs but no one wants to ADMIT our country and our constitution have been hijacked. Our government is totally bought and paid for and we are being drained of everything we once had- dignity and the right to pursue happiness without the government deciding what we can and cannot do, buy or own.
Many will say that these things aren't true and that is my point.

It seems the ideas relative to the death of real science expressed in Judges Kings and Pirates are shared by some of those with actual science credentials! And being censored by TED!

 http://www.disinfo.com/2013/03/graham-hancock-calls-out-teds-blatant-censorship/

 In attempt to brush up their severely tarnished image after censoring my presentation“The War on Consciousness” from the TEDx website today (on the grounds that I was “unscientific”) and also censoring the presentation “The Science Delusion” by my colleague Rupert Sheldrake for the same reason, TED have now rushed to create a remote corner of their website, which I imagine they hope no-one will see, where our talks have been put back online and may be debated: http://blog.ted.com/2013/03/14/open-for-discussion-graham-hancock-and-rupert-sheldrake/.This gesture, they claim, is in response to my suggestion that they had censored us and should be taken as evidence of their “spirit of radical openness”. The science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality, in principle. The fundamental questions are answered, leaving only the details to be filled in. The impressive achievements of science seemed to support this confident attitude. But recent research has revealed unexpected problems at the heart of physics, cosmology, biology, medicine and psychology. Dr Rupert Sheldrake shows how the sciences are being constricted by assumptions that have hardened into dogmas. Should science be a belief-system, or a realm of enquiry? Sheldrake argues that science would be better off without its dogmas: freer, more interesting and more fun. Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. is a biologist and author of more than 80 scientific papers and 10 books, including The Science Delusion. He was a Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge University, a Research Fellow of the Royal Society, Principal Plant Physiologist at ICRISAT (the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) in Hyderabad, India, and from 2005-2010 the Director of the Perrott-Warrick Project, funded from Trinity College, Cambridge.

What is it called when someone repeats and spreads soundbites he or she hears on the radio or television (or Facebook) without knowing whether it is true- much less, investigating its meaning or source? Well, I call it "fribbling." It just sounds right and this essentially dishonest and careless activity needs to be recognized and given a name. Fribbling has actually become the principal activity of what used to be called the journalists of the main-stream media. If the story line furthers your agenda it is worth repeating. This is true of both the left and the right. There is also something called "reverse fribbling." This is when someone with responsibility to tell the truth, leaves out something that is true but that would go against their agenda. With the liberalization of academia and the media, fribbling and reverse fribbling have become the great un-equalizer. If they say it often enough (and they do) it becomes "true."

This is how man-made global warming became "true." This is how a ridiculous theory of evolution became "true." This is how liberals get elected.

Why write a book? There are, of course many reasons, and many reasons not to. But when you commit to writing a book, you commit to growth and and you find out something about the world and yourself. Before I started the research for JKP, I believed there were two political parties who could make things better or worse, depending on your point of view. What I found out...well, some of you will refuse to listen and some of you just don't care. My hope is that a few-- those whose minds are still open-- strangely, after years of indoctrination at the hands of the media and academia, will change course and pursue the only truth that exists. www.createspace.com/3570414
Jim Gleeson